Townsville's urban forest is an invaluable asset to the city. Our trees and other vegetation provide shade, shelter and habitat, prevent erosion, mitigate the impacts of flooding and store carbon. They are arguably our best weapon for adapting to climate change and preventing biodiversity loss.

When two large, beloved trees were removed from Anzac Park in March 2021, Townsville locals (and former locals) were saddened and shocked. Joanne Keune, who regularly passed the site on her morning run, shared photos to social media, attracting significant attention. Sadness of their loss soon turned to distress and anger, as questions arose regarding the reason for their removal and the lack of community consultation. Realising there was work to be done to ensure this didn't happen again, the Townsville Tree Advocacy Group formed. Below is a timeline of what happened next.

TIMELINE

19 March 2021: Two large, seemingly healthy shade trees are removed from Anzac Park with no public notification or community consultation. 

26 March 2021: A vigil is held for the lost trees, attended by local tree lovers, the media, Councillor Ann-Maree Greaney and Matt Richardson (Construction, Maintenance and Operations). Our story is featured on Win News, ABC Radio and in The Townsville Bulletin. 

23 March 2021: NQCC publishes an open letter to the three government agencies responsible for the trees' removal, which receives 247 signatures and many heartfelt comments.

May 2021: NQCC lodges Right to Information requests with the three government agencies behind the trees' removal.

July 2021: Bernadette Boscacci lodges an e-petition with Townsville City Council, which receives 97 signatures. She presents to Council where her e-petition is to be tabled.

August 2021: NQCC receives a document bundle (from FOI requests), including correspondence and arborist reports. 

August 2021: Joanne and Crystal attend a meeting with Mayor Jenny Hill, Matt Richardson (Construction, Maintenance and Operations) and Greg Bruce (Environmental Services), in which we are informed of the drafting of a Tree Management Policy. We insist that the community should be consulted in the drafting of the policy.

8 September 2021: Townsville City Council's Public Tree Management Policy is presented to the Infrastructure Committee meeting, prior to its release for community consultation.

9 September 2021: Bernadette Boscacci, Crystal Falknau and David Cassells make a presentation to the Community Health, Safety and Environmental Sustainability Committee.

11 October 2021: NQCC's submission is one of 70 submissions received by Council. 

13 October 2021: Community consultation closes and TCC releases a Stakeholder Engagement Public Consultation Report. We provide a summary and an update to our supporters. 

18 October 2021: Council officers meet with NQCC, CDTLI, MINCA and MICDA to provide feedback to detailed responses which were received during the consultation period. 

21 October 2021: A Report to Council is issued into the Townsville City Council Public Tree Management Policy and Guidelines.

29 October 2021: Townsville City Council's Public Tree Management Policy is tabled at the October Ordinary Council meeting and is adopted (to find the video in the link, go to the left side panel labelled "event bookmarks" and scroll down to "Townsville City Council Public Tree Management Policy and Guidelines").

16 September 2022: Following some reports via Facebook of the unexplained removal of some public trees, the Townsville Tree Advocacy Group meets.

22 September 2022: A letter is sent to TCC's Community Health, Safety and Environmental Sustainability Committee, Matt Richardson and Reece Wilkie (Parks, Open Space and Environment), requesting an update on the effectiveness of the Public Tree Management Policy. 

This advocacy work has been driven by the people power of our community, and we would like to particularly recognise the time and energy that the Townsville Tree Advocacy Group has contributed to the above activities. 

Principles we would like to see for managing "problematic" trees/vegetation (i.e. sick, damaged, hazardous, impacting on infrastructure etc.):

• Their social, economic and environmental value should be taken into consideration
• Alternative options to removal (such as pruning, root walling and changes to nearby/planned infrastructure) should be seriously considered
• The local community should be consulted with, particularly regarding the management of significant trees/vegetation
• Removal/destruction of vegetation should be a last resort
• If removal (or significant pruning) occurs, appropriate offsets should be established nearby and as soon as possible

Image source: Townsville City Council's Public Consultation Report

After approximately six months of engaging with Townsville City Council (alongside other community members and groups) regarding their approach to vegetation protection, residents were given the opportunity to provide feedback on TCC's Draft Public Tree Management Policy.

The opportunity to provide feedback closed on Wednesday 13 October, with 70 submissions received. Read on for more information on what we have learned since...

This month, NQCC and local tree advocates arranged a meeting with the Townsville Mayor and relevant council staff. Crystal and Joanne met with Mayor Jenny Hill, Matt Richardson (Construction, Maintenance and Operations) and Greg Bruce (Environmental Services) to discuss a way forward with a better process for caring for Townsville's trees.

This guest post is contributed by the Invasive Species Council. The Invasive Species Council campaigns for stronger laws, policies and programs to keep Australia’s native plants and animals safe from weeds, feral animals and other invaders. http://www.invasive.org.au

The battle to protect Queensland’s Wet Tropics World Heritage Area from yellow crazy ants has had new life breathed into it with the promise of $10.5 million over the next three years, enough to resuscitate an eradication program that was on the verge of collapse.

The Federal Government has committed $7.5 million and Queensland will kick in another $3 million. However, the Wet Tropics Management Authority says it needs $15 million to eradicate the invasive ant. 

Yellow crazy ants are considered among the world’s worst invasive species. Unchecked they form super colonies that can devastate native animal populations and turn rainforests into ghost towns.

This guest post is contributed by the Invasive Species Council. The Invasive Species Council campaigns for stronger laws, policies and programs to keep Australia’s native plants and animals safe from weeds, feral animals and other invaders. http://www.invasive.org.au

Koster’s curse. Photo: Forest & Kim Starr (Licence: CCBY 2.0)

Koster’s curse has been described as Australia’s new lantana. A slow-growing invasive weed, it smothers pastures and the native understorey of tropical rainforests.

It poses a threat to agriculture and the rainforests of our wet tropics. In Hawaii it has smothered everything in its path and forced landowners off their land – a bleak outlook for Australia’s beautiful wet tropics.

The Burdekin Dry Tropics Natural Resource Management (NRM) Plan was officially launched on 26th August. It is the only one of its kind in the region and forms the blueprint for how the community can work together to protect and sustainably manage our natural resources for the next 10 years. Read the Burdekin Dry Tropics NRM Plan here.

Here is a directory of different groups providing volunteer opportunities with on-ground conservation or environmental projects in the local region:

Conservation Volunteers Australia projects in Townsville region – check this website to confirm correct dates, meeting location and contact details. Projects include Creekwatch (water quality testing and surveys), Friends of Cape Pallarenda Quarantine Station and native revegetation nursey.

Last night, the Queensland government failed to pass vital land-clearing reform legislation.

This is a disaster of Queensland’s making. It’s a huge win for big agriculture and a terrible blow for our Reef, climate change and hundreds of Queensland’s vulnerable or endangered species.

The health of our Reef is directly linked to increased erosion that comes from the tree clearing. Queensland has now passed up the chance to take real steps to protect our Reef for Australians and visitors around the world who support a major tourism industry.

Welcome to this month’s Paperbark! It has been a busy month of planning events and making submissions about various conservation issues being reviewed. Just a reminder: if you were a member in 2015/2016, you have until 5 September until your membership officially lapses. Click here to renew your membership.

In this issue: Protecting our wildlife – Vegetation Management laws – Climate Change Policy – Upcoming Events – General Notices.

On the 11^th of August, NQCC staffers Maree Dibella and Jacob Miller attended Hon. Dr Steven Miles’ presentation on the challenges facing the Great Barrier Reef, as the Virginia Chadwick Memorial Lecture. Dr Miles unveiled the findings of a report by the Water Science Taskforce that details an $8.2 billion strategy to save the reef over the next decade.

The strategy is to reduce the amount of sediment that runs off into the reef by managing vegetation clearing and addressing gully erosion. Of particular concern is the Fitzroy catchment near Rockhampton, taking about three-quarters of the recommended funding, as well as the Burdekin catchment to the south of Townsville, which requires $1.39 billion for rehabilitation.